One thing missing for me is an seeming assumption of a Me or I quarterbacking the discussion. The I in ‘I think therefore I am’. What if there is no I? What if itʼs only being in action rather than I’m taking action or I am experiencing or I am this, that, and the other thing? Why must I be limited to being a thing among other things?
From another angle, how does the sensorium square up to encounters with nothing (no-thing)?
Great post and thanks for sharing a little art history.
Using chatgpt as an example, I've found it interesting the content where ChatGPT is the subject (for example I saw an atheist try to use arguments for the existence of God to get ChatGPT to say it believes in God.
You idea of a creativity spin wheel made me think of the Oblique strategies cards from Brian Eno. Perhaps we could create a sensory set?
Very nice translating into visuals.
One thing missing for me is an seeming assumption of a Me or I quarterbacking the discussion. The I in ‘I think therefore I am’. What if there is no I? What if itʼs only being in action rather than I’m taking action or I am experiencing or I am this, that, and the other thing? Why must I be limited to being a thing among other things?
From another angle, how does the sensorium square up to encounters with nothing (no-thing)?
Love it, Mauro!
Great post and thanks for sharing a little art history.
Using chatgpt as an example, I've found it interesting the content where ChatGPT is the subject (for example I saw an atheist try to use arguments for the existence of God to get ChatGPT to say it believes in God.
You idea of a creativity spin wheel made me think of the Oblique strategies cards from Brian Eno. Perhaps we could create a sensory set?